 |
| Some people bang away at the keyboard on online sites and facebook pages like woody woodpecker talking about how they will be fiscally conservative. I prefer the direct approach--actually proposing and supporting cuts :) |
As I see this morning's article in the PNJ about Tuesday and Wednesday's budget meetings, I could not help but ask myself this rhetorical question:
How could we? How could we glide through this year where there is enough in the kitty to get us by with very little pain knowing full well next year we start out a minimum of $5 Million short?
How could we not set aside some money from this year in anticipation of next year's fiscal cliff from which we will fall?
How could we not make deeper cuts to outside agencies? (the ones that are not mandated to be funded by the state, and the ones that have significant budgets already and who would survive without our funding).
How could we tell our employees that we will continue to fund all agencies at requested levels with only modest, meager trimmings here and there, while also telling these same employees we won't necessarily be able to provide raises next year and more than likely they will absorb increases in benefits costs next year?
How could we tell property owners the BCC may raise tax rates (I'll NEVER SUPPORT THIS) but we are still funding outside agencies?
Some people talk a lot about being fiscally conservative....online like woody the woodpecker on a keyboard, at some public gatherings, etc. talk talk talk. Talk is cheap, actions speak louder than words, though.
It is for this reason that I took action and proposed cuts at the meetings this week. There was very little appetite for this from my peers--and this is disappointing.
The good news is I'm not done proposing cuts, and when the time comes for the final vote on these budgets, I will propose more cuts. We will see what happens at that time. If we only tweak at the margins on the budget this year, shame on us because we can't act as if we don't see what's coming next year, we know better. Arliss Howard's character Cowboy said it best when he state emphatically: "we can't refuse to accept the situation!"
He is right, we can't "refuse to accept the situation" for comfort's sake......How could we?
Answer: I won't, but I'm just one vote on the board....and unless I die in the meantime, I'll be here next year whereas perhaps three that are involved in this year's budget might not be. So no, I'm not going to take the easy route and eat the cake and cookies and throw the broccoli and eggplant in the trash till next year. Nope.
Jeff, I always am appreciative of your posts, and never more than this one. Because I fear I resemble your online woodpecker remark. :(
ReplyDeleteAs you're I think aware, I've been trying to figure out whether banging away on my computer at these meeting I attend anyway is helpful. I've had a few people that have told me it is helpful. But I'm not going to assume that the consensus is that mainlining a public free speech forum that I don't administer is good for our community.
I will admit, I am trying to expose fraudulII ent behavior and rhetoric in a real-time fashion, so it's not like I'm pretending these are transcripts. And I really have no idea what the commissioners think of what I'm doing.
I'm an acadenic; I'm trainable; I listen.
The other day, I got up and blasted the conversations because it devolved to cats versus dogs.
It was surreal today, because when we got there a half hour late, the conversation was literally blue versus white. Or white versus off white. And I don't mean anything bad on Grover per that; he was right to voice that What The Hell on a public building planned white with a crap ton of mainetenance that will keep it looking, at best, like crap.
What I really want your opinion on is, are these "feeds" that are coming from various Facebook account helpful or hurtful to public process and discourse? Because ALL I want is more transparency. I am happy to be guided by you and the other commissioners on the dais who have my full respect. Please provide some guidance. Not wanting to be a woodpecker :(
Melissa Pino
413 SE Baublits Drive
I truly hope the BOCC considers re-evaluating the Sheriff's gift of the 2nd installment to money that WON'T BE USED APROPRIATELY.
ReplyDeleteI get it that the wood pecker is Underhill claiming to be a fiscal conservative blabbing about OLF 8 etc while underhand trying to get his own agenda passed.. Pecking it out in his own hypnotized fb groupie group..using it on the campaign trail..although some of us comment and do peck away also.. Some more than others..Takes all kinds..We are Bergosh fans though😎
ReplyDeleteFee Simple fine with me, $$$ in the ad valorem from PBeach, offsets the middle class saying yes to amendment one.. Thanks for calling the special meeting with SRIA and BOCC. Would be nice if the BOCC could re evaluate Mr. Emmissary getting all the $$ to MoMoneyMo ..I think we get you guys did your part though..
ReplyDelete