In 2021, the $427 Million replacement
bridge now under construction over Pensacola Bay will be completed. Current FDOT policy and practice dictates
replacement structure(s) carry the same designations as the original structure(s)
replaced-absent any new legislative action.
In this instance and by an act of the Florida legislature in
1961-the bridge connecting Pensacola with Gulf Breeze is officially recognized
as the “Philip D. Beall Sr. Memorial Bridge”—although most locals call it the
“3-Mile Bridge.” (Sen. Philip D. Beall
was a State Senator from Pensacola from 1935 until 1943.)
But some folks now insist we give this replacement structure
a new name—stripping the Beall family name and re-naming it the Daniel R. “Chappie”
James bridge. (Chappie James was a
decorated combat aviator, the first black man to become a 4-star general in the
U.S. Military.)
I believe a better tribute for a great man like Chappie
would be for us to rename
Pensacola’s airport in his honor—after all, Chappie was an aviator! If Louisville Kentucky can rename their
city’s airport for their favorite son, Mohammad Ali, then why can’t Pensacola do
this same thing for Chappie James?
Beall’s descendants have suggested a fair compromise amidst
all this rancorous debate—a dual designation of the bridge, honoring both men.
Unfortunately- this magnanimous, common-sense gesture was
rebuked.
Our legislative delegation, meanwhile, has signaled its
willingness to introduce legislation to change the bridge’s official designation-- if this is the will of the four interested
communities.
Pensacola and Santa Rosa County have already taken formal
votes on this.
Escambia County and the city of Gulf Breeze, however, have
wisely moved forward with a committee approach for considering this issue--allowing
individual citizens a voice in this decision.
(citizens may send their thoughts to:
namethebridge@myescambia.com
)
I’m hopeful this committee will listen to all sides of this matter
with open minds.
Because sadly--some folks that are supportive of changing
the bridge’s name have now resorted to denigrating a family’s legacy by calling
Sen. Beall a “racist”- an insidious claim
that has no basis in fact!
This negative turn in the discussion has been devastating to
Beall’s descendants.
Senator Beall’s daughter sat in my office going through
memorabilia recently—and emotionally asked me this: “Why do they want to erase
my family’s history-our family wasn’t racist?”
Nevertheless-- individuals pushing to tear Beall’s name from
the bridge continue assaulting his legacy, pointing to legislation the senator
sponsored in 1935 that made Democratic primaries statewide "white
only."
But these primaries were ubiquitous in the 1930s south; the
Supreme Court decision in Grovey v. Townsend
ruled that such primaries were lawful and didn’t deprive citizens of their 14th
or 15th Amendment rights. It was about party politics of that time,
not race.
Meanwhile-- every racist injustice committed by Andrew
Jackson, FDR, Robert Byrd, and other historic figures that have monuments
locally and nationwide---apparently, these are a non-issue. (Jackson owned slaves, FDR force-segregated black
troops and illegally interred American Citizens of Japanese descent. Byrd was in
the Ku Klux Klan—yet all these guys’ monuments stand proudly?)
It’s rank hypocrisy that’s borderline delusional.
Allowing ANY angry mob to become the de facto “monument
police,” re-writing our history to suit their agenda and ideology, condemning
selected historical figures while ignoring historical realities, acting as
judge, jury and executioner to erase history—this is wrong!
I don’t-- and we shouldn’t—countenance the sanitizing of
history by condoning the forceful destruction of statues, the removal of monuments,
and/or the stealing of families' memorial designations----on the orders of ANY angry
mob.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Abusive, profane, and/or off-topic posts will not be allowed. Unprovoked ad-hominem attacks will not be tolerated. All posts are subject to moderation, posts that violate these policies, spam, posts containing off-color language, and any other inappropriate comments or content, as determined by the blog administrator, will remain in moderation and may not be added on the site. This site is not my campaign site, but in an abundance of caution I will offer the below disclaimer.