This morning’s regular meeting of the board of county
commissioners included a continued discussion about OLF-8 following our
contentious committee of the whole last week—where emails that were
embarrassing to our “consultant” and very condescending (if not overtly hostile)
to the commissioners and our project came to light in Rick’s Blog. These were a result of a public records request made by Outzen in which the unflattering emails were turned over and
subsequently published.
It has resulted in a significant PR Black eye for DPZ and
Navy Federal Credit Union---with the latter being named a “Loser” in this
week’s iNWEEKLY “Winners and Losers” section...(p. 4-5 of the edition)
Since that time additional emails have been turned over and
a repeated pattern has emerged that is troubling to me; when innocuous, routine
issues are discussed—our county project management team is copied. When interaction between NFCU and some
neighbors that are against any commerce on the field occur—our county staff is
not copied.
And now I see that in multiple emails copied to our
consultant’s team leader, Registered Architect Marina Khoury, troubling
insinuations and outright lies are told about our project and the commissioners---yet
this information was not passed along to the County by project manager Khoury. The client was not told of this at the time
it was happening, last summer and fall. Why NOT? In one of these emails it is stated that the
goal is to “embarrass the commissioners”--in another—the dark insinuation is
made that the commissioners are engaging in “malfeasance” as far as it pertains
to the OLF-8 project. Again--these
emails were copied to our “supposed” consulting group DPZ’s team leader. But county staff was not warned/notified/or
told. I confirmed that today through our
Administrator.
Theresa Blackwell can say whatever she wants, she can send
emails out to the PNJ, neighbors, whomever she chooses. Navy Federal personnel can do likewise.
But when anyone associated with this project—either in the
community or stakeholders—copies our consultant on intentions to “embarrass us”and insinuations we are engaging in “malfeasance”—we MUST be notified immediately-as we are
the client. To purposely not notify us is
very, very unprofessional and deceptive.
It appears it may also be a breach of professional ethics. This is being researched.
This email, above, that insinuates the BCC is engaging in malfeasance was copied to DPZ team leader Marina Khoury back in September......but DPZ's client was NOT notified...why? |
So yes, I’m glad Chairman Bender had a meeting with NFCU’s Keith Hoskins and others and brought a
new, better plan—it’s a start and it moderated, significantly, what would have been an otherwise VERY contentious meeting. Plus, this new plan is a step in the right direction.But I still have grave concerns about the ethical lapses
that have happened here, and the undue influence one large company and a small,
vocal minority of opponents were given.
And I am furious about the lack of deference DPZ in general, and Khoury
specifically, demonstrated toward us when they did not keep their client (the
county) notified of these machinations as they were happening in real time as
they should have done..
To get to the bottom of it all, I will wait for turnover of
all the records and text messages (which I have requested today) from, to, by,
and between the DPZ team and any others subject to release and related to the
county’s OLF-8 project and the commission.
https://jeffbergoshblog.blogspot.com/2020/01/another-pnj-editorial-explodes-on.html
ReplyDeleteWho wrote the editorials?
ReplyDeletehttps://jeffbergoshblog.blogspot.com/2021/01/dishonest-pnj-sunday-editorial-jumble.html
I'm Not a Cat: The two person "crack" PNJ editorial board of Andy Marlette and Lisa Nellessen Savage wrote the editorials that elicited the responses you linked from me :)
ReplyDeletecartoons
ReplyDeletehttps://www.foxnews.com/politics/cartoons-slideshow
What we really need in this area is a new High School! Once the pandemic is over Tate will be more overcrowded than usual. Has anyone done an impact study on all the new housing developments and Tate? They should!!
ReplyDelete