Attached to this email I sent them, above, was this 600 page rebuttal, below, to Sunday's Editorial.
Wednesday, January 15, 2020
PNJ Won't Even Acknowledge My Email--Meaning They Won't Print this Rebuttal
I sent this email to the PNJ editorial team Monday Evening in response to their Sunday editorial that was a complete hatchet piece on three of the commissioners--as of today no response at all, no acknowledgment that I even sent it. It doesn't surprise me, I did not think they would print it......
6 comments:
Abusive, profane, and/or off-topic posts will not be allowed. Unprovoked ad-hominem attacks will not be tolerated. All posts are subject to moderation, posts that violate these policies, spam, posts containing off-color language, and any other inappropriate comments or content, as determined by the blog administrator, will remain in moderation and may not be added on the site. This site is not my campaign site, but in an abundance of caution I will offer the below disclaimer.
Well perhaps the word is getting out to come here for the truth.
ReplyDeleteQuint Studer on the CC line noted ;)
I do like his management style articles.
Too much conflict is dysfunction.
Owens posted that PNJ on his campaign fb page and people run to it. Seems unfortunately people react to social media propaganda rather than what happens in meetings. Gullible they are.
ReplyDeleteYes the Editorial Board seems to be kissing up to Underhill and Escambia Citizens Watch. They fail to report Underhill voted to allow a cheaper OPT OUT of the sector plan with all of you. Boy that burned Mrs. Rogers butt I betcha. I think Underhill was trying to get you all to vote to pay his legal fees that day if I'm not mistaken Barry brought that as an Add on after a marathon meeting and you all voted for it and also voted to give Century chamber of commerce money to North Escambia -- how convenient during an election cycle. You were like "whatever you want..I've got to go"
ReplyDeleteStuder seems to be tongue in cheek siding with Gilley in his management articles and talking about the county in a veiled way.
So yes they are controlling the story toward that leaning...
Have to agree with some of it though.
Politics.
Yes people are watching.
They haven't covered that Edler dropped the case on Pino and that Selover has filed a suit, nor that the Medical director put in a demand for 100K taxpayer funds.
ReplyDeleteThey are being very selective in what they are covering, which is very interesting. They obviously were leaked a document they should not have, PNJ called me Friday about that....no story. Good--that information is classified and should not have been released to them, and that's what I told their reporter. But even still, I got the eerie sense that a story was surely imminent. But then it was apparently embargoed....wonder who shut it down, and why? I am told on good authority that Jim Little was provided a copy of the complaint against the county for Selover's case. Wonder if that document got the powers that be thinking at the PNJ. No mention of that complaint either. Maybe they are realizing they jumped the gun when they attempted to chastise me in their garbage pile, rubbish editorial from a week ago Sunday. If they read the complaint in the Selover case-----------I believe they will see why I was so animated in my request for a policy change to prevent this from happening. Uh oh--maybe PNJ realizes that I was right in my outrage and that looking at that complaint side by side with their "editorial" makes them look stupid, foolish, rash, and definitely without question on the WRONG SIDE of the issue? Too many questions and the silence from them is deafening..
ReplyDeleteThe clerk of court has not posted the complaint. What are they waiting for? They posted the cover letter as a public record not the complaint. Is it a secret?
ReplyDelete