I am one member of a five person board. The opinions I express on this forum are mine only, and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the Escambia County Staff, Administrators, Employees, or anyone else associated with Escambia County Florida. I am interested in establishing this blog as a means of additional transparency to the public, outreach to the community, and information dissemination to all who choose to look. Feedback is welcome, but because public participation is equally encouraged, appropriate language and decorum is mandatory.
Friday, January 19, 2018
The project to add an outlet for NFCU personnel to exit their premises in the afternoon via an access point through the welcome center is dead. This is extremely disappointing because that option was the smartest, most economical, most practical, and could have been done quickly. But Federal bureaucrats killed that idea.
The next initiative to address this issue and overall congestion on 9-mile road, the one that is gaining steam right now, is an elevated overpass on 9-Mile Road concept.
This will allow NFCU employees to exit via two dedicated left-turn lanes coming out of Navy Federal Way under 9-mile road headed eastbound, while simultaneously allowing the free flow of traffic on 9-mile road east and west above.
The first several conceptual drawings I saw of this plan did not take into account the access to 9-Mile road from several adjacent developments on the north and south side of 9-Mile road.
This latest drawing does a better job of taking these other property owners' interests into account, and appears to be something that could work.
While my initial concerns about this plan were significant and several are still valid ($68 Million Dollar Cost, 4-6 years to complete, continued disruption to existing traffic on 9-Mile road for Beulah residents, noise above the sound barriers for residents along the south side of 9-Mile road in Nature Trail)--this latest drawing is a significant improvement over previous renditions.
I still believe we need to ensure that before we go full speed ahead with this, all affected area
Thursday, January 18, 2018
I appreciated the opportunity to be on this call, and I appreciated the candor expressed by the participants. I think a lot of confusion is and was created by the "Option 1" of the four OST options floated as potential solutions to NFCU's traffic issues in Beulah. A lot of the reasoning for the back exit not being allowed was also expressed in the below email I received on the 17th. Apparently----the back exit out of the visitor's center was never, ever going to be considered no matter what. I only wonder why, if it was never, ever going to be seriously considered, Navy Federal and the County were made to jump through so many hoops in the hope of having this back exit at the Welcome Center approved? I mean, why all the work toward this if the real answer always was simply "You can request to build a brand new Interchange adjacent to the welcome center west of exit 5 with a new overpass and brand new collector and distributor lanes on the north and the south of Interstate 10 between the Visitor's Center and Exit 5, complete with brand new east and westbound access to the interstate" I mean--if that really was what was being presented, that was a non-solution from go.
We are already well on the way to constructing a new Interchange at Beulah Road--everyone knows that and that is the most important project in District 1 right now. ( And the County for that matter). I think it is for this reason that in these documents the County and NFCU enacted---the solution was never characterized as a brand new "interchange" --the solution was characterized as a brand new "Access Point." Be that as it may--if this is indeed the final word, we must now take a step back and re evaluate the remaining options and be very deliberate in our due-diligence going forward. A knee-jerk rush to a new potential solution for expediency's sake could be very problematic, and therefore I am going to study any new proposal upside down and backward, front to back, head to toe, to ensure it passes the smell test and that it is equitable to all nearby neighbors and developers impacted, and that it makes fiscal sense in light of the taxpayer dollars that are being invested right now with the 4-lane project on 9-Mile Road and the Beulah Interchange project that is well underway just 2 miles West of this area....
For now, based upon the conference call and the below email--it does indeed appear as if the back exit through the welcome center is dead.
Many topics of interest will be discussed...
1..Forest Creek Apartment Purchase with FEMA grant money
2. Communications to the public in times of emergency (like yesterday's weather event)
3. Eminent Domain in Cantonment
4. Water issue at the jail yesterday and how it was solved
5. What is happening with the back exit (through the welcome center) proposal for easing NFCU traffic on 9 mile road.
You can hear the interview in its entirety here
Monday, January 15, 2018
|"You can pick any horse in the barn, as long as you select this one" Thomas Hobson (1544-1631)|
A Hobson's choice is a false choice. It is an illusion of choice with only one real choice being offered.
The term Hobson's choice is derived from the legend of stable owner Thomas Hobson of Cambridge, England, from the 16th century.
Hobson was known far and wide as the stable owner that had 40 stalls; he had a large selection of horses from which purchasers could compare and choose.
Once prospective buyers came to Hobson's stable, however, the "choice" was actually limited to the horse in the stall nearest the door to the stable. "You can choose between any horse in the stable, so long as you select this one!" Hobson would exclaim. So the assortment of possible choices really, in actuality, never existed. Thus the term "Hobson's choice" was born.
So when I am looking at a list of potential solutions for rapid deployment to address acute and pressing traffic issues locally on 9-mile road that have been listed as FEDERAL DOT options for local selection and implementation--I see a sort of Hobson's Choice scenario developing. Here are the four options (and my interpretation of what they really mean):
- Navy Federal Credit Union would donate Navy Federal Drive to become a public road. Connect this road with a new I-10 interstate access. This option may require a collector/distributor lane with the eastbound traffic from the welcome center and the Nine Mile Road interchange. (translation--no egress out of the welcome center will ever be permitted by the feds ever, no matter what, we do not have a decider at the federal level who will look at this as a rational option--no matter what. Although this option kind of sounds like that, and this option is intentionally, vaguely worded to kind of sound like it might allow a back exit out of the welcome center---- this is not that. No way, never. This is actually a no to the back exit out of the welcome center and a "yes" to a 9-10 year project to build a brand new I-10 interchange between the visitors center and exit 5, complete with a new westbound access, overpass over the freeway, and service access roads on both sides of the freeway, east and west, and oh, by the way, this would be incredibly expensive and would jeopardize the most important project in Escambia County right now, the Beulah Interchange at I-10 at Isaccs Lane. Not a realistic option)
- Constructing a new roadway between the West End of the NFCU facility and Frank Reeder Road, and constructing a new interchange with I-10 at the Beulah Road area. The construction of the new roadway will provide NFCU access to the new I-10 interchange through Frank Reeder Road and Beulah Road. This will provide NFCU access to the west, north, west and east in the area.(translation--you can build a brand new interchange where you are already planning to build one in the next 7 years--but you can't just do a temporary eastbound onramp only for now-- to help alleviate the congestion for NFCU employees trying to get out--nope the full interchange would have to be built simultaneously....so no, this is not really an option to help us in the short run...)
- Constructing a left exit flyover from Navy Federal Way onto Nine Mile Road to improve access from NFCU to the Nine Mile Road and I-10 existing interchange.(translation-at a cost of nearly $70 Million dollars, a minimum of 48 months of ADDITIONAL planning and construction, more traffic delays and congestion for years to come at the critical 1/2 mile west of 9-mile road leading to the I-10 exit 5 onramp, tremendous challenges to south of 9-mile road property developers desperately seeking access points on 9-mile road, and to residential neighbors [Nature Trail] that will now be looking at a 25' high overpass over their recently constructed 15' noise barrier walls---this is the Hobson's Choice.
I am working to find the very best solution to an acute traffic issue that is building in my district.
Folks have worked very hard to help ameliorate the traffic caused by the rapid growth in Beulah and by the growth of the workforce at Navy Federal Credit Union's rapidly-expanding campus in Beulah.
The four lane project for 9-mile road is well underway, with completion expected in mid 2019.
The Beulah beltway project is moving forward, but this option is 7-10 years away.
Meanwhile, we are grateful for the growth, we are very fortunate for NFCU coming here and bringing jobs, and we understand that a moderate amount of traffic is to be expected when so much is going on in one constrained geographic area.
It is for this reason that I am especially disappointed to hear that a common-sense, low-cost, and quick-turnaround [relatively speaking] measure to provide egress out of the Florida welcome center for NFCU's afternoon shift change, a project that I was told had been blessed at Federal DOT as one of four local projects to help with traffic, has now been scuttled.
Federal officials with which I have spoken have pointed to Florida Department of Transportation as
Sometimes getting to the best solution to a complex problem is agonizing and tedious. Sometimes it is excruciating and exasperating. We are dealing with just such a complex issue, a traffic issue, right now in District 1.
When I heard late last month that suddenly the common-sense initiative to allow egress out of Navy Federal Credit Union's north end property, via a new access to I-10 through the Florida welcome center, was rejected--I naturally wanted to know why. Several people intimately familiar with this project told me point blank: It's the FEDS. It is Federal Highway.
So late last month I wrote this blog post that subsequently made its way onto another site and a TV story came out and a newspaper article about this issue was published in the PNJ on January 4th. The statement was simple--we need a decider, at the Federal Level, who can look at this issue and make the smart call to alleviate the tremendous traffic issue currently happening in my district affecting residents of Beulah and employees of Navy Federal Credit Union. And the PNJ article said the FEDS had approved of the back exit plan!
But now I have learned something interesting...Someone has once again said no--even though I now have proof The FEDS said Yes! So now I ask---Who said NO?!?
According to Congressman Matt Gaetz's office--four specific options have been cleared by Federal Department of Transportation for implementation locally by the Florida Department of Transportation to address this issue. His office has communicated to me that they do not want to be seen as favoring one solution over others--but rather wanted to help accommodate the locally chosen solution of the four by obtaining clearance from FED DOT, in advance, of any one or more of the following four options which are all still approved at the FED DOT level as of January 2018 per an email of which I am now in receipt. The current, Federally approved (OST, DOT) list of potential solutions are the following:
1. Navy Federal Credit Union would donate Navy Federal Drive to become a public road. Connect this road with a new I-10 interstate access. This option may require a collector/distributor lane with the eastbound traffic from the welcome center and the Nine Mile Road interchange.
2. Constructing a new roadway between the West End of the NFCU facility and Frank Reeder Road, and constructing a new interchange with I-10 at the Beulah Road area. The construction of the new roadway will provide NFCU access to the new I-10 interchange through Frank Reeder Road and Beulah Road. This will provide NFCU access to the west, north, west and east in the area.
3. Constructing a left exit flyover from Navy Federal Way onto Nine Mile Road to improve access from NFCU to the Nine Mile Road and I-10 existing interchange.
4. Intersection operational improvements along Nine Mile Road (i.e. signal timing, roundabouts, turn lanes) and making general improvements to the on and off ramps at the Nine Mile Road and I-10 existing interchange to meet vehicular demand.
Obviously--option 1 is the least disruptive (to current 9-mile road traffic), most fiscally sound, most expeditious, and most practical approach to solving the issue and disbursing traffic between two exits.
Friday, January 12, 2018
|Between what the sheriff's office unilaterally did with making requests directly on our BCC agenda, and what the commissioners discussed and accepted yesterday at the COW--it looks as if a new and workable LETF process has been born!|
At Thursday's Committee of the Whole meeting, a brief discussion on the Law Enforcement Trust Fund approval/disbursement process was placed on the agenda by administrator Jack Brown.
The brief discussion focused on the process: Administrator Brown stated that the way the sheriff submitted his requests for the last regular meeting could be folded into the new process going forward, and this met with support from the majority of the commissioners. I know I certainly support this method because it more closely comports with the statutes and it allows us to vote on expenditures before they are made--not after the fact as has been the previous method.
Commissioner Robinson advocated for us submitting an application to the Sheriff for LET funds to be utilized to offset School Resource Officer program costs--which would save money from the Sheriff's general fund budget. This also appeared to meet with support from a majority of the board. (Although I think the likelihood of the Sheriff approving this is not high...if he chose to do this--he could do this already without anyone asking)
Commissioner May wanted to see us submit requests to the Sheriff for BCC identified youth development programs--and this met with unanimous support from the BCC.
We also decided to have the corrections department submit an application to the sheriff for funding for Drug Patches to be worn by offenders who are sentenced to wear these by judges in our circuit.
(Funding has been running low for these effective, cost-saving devices)
So, to summarize, it appears as though the Sheriff's change in process combined with what commissioners have decided = problem solved and case closed on this matter--as the process will apparently go forward as follows:
The Sheriff ,via his CFO Henrique Dias, will place any requests for LETF disbursal (that his internal ECSO process has already green-lighted) on the BCC agenda of their choice for our consideration