The BCC will be discussing the topic of criminal justice reform
at tomorrow’s Committee of the Whole meeting.
Presented for backup were several articles from Florida Tax Watch and a
recent article from IN Weekly.
After reading the backup and speaking to folks very familiar
with the courts locally, I have a few thoughts of my own on these recommended
initiatives….but first, it is important to realize how the system works in real
life.
Law enforcement officers make arrests.
The State Attorney is like a “Super Judge” and this office
has discretion with respect to which cases get charged and what penalties are
sought. From time to time, Judges will
disagree with sentences sought by the State Attorney, and this can create
tension between the offices.
Judges try the cases.
Judges do what they do-prosecutors do what they do- and police officers
do what they do.
To enact serious sentencing reform, we have to get buy-in
and cooperation from the judges. We have
to elect good judges to the bench, and we have to understand that sometimes we
will disagree with their sentences. We
must understand this as well: judges know more
about the cases than do the media and members of the general public. Often the sentences the judges impose are
mandatory and the judges have minimal discretion; in other instances the Judges
do have discretion and wide latitude to impose various punishments-which they
frequently exercise.
The media exacerbates the sentencing discretion issue when
they fail to report on cases honestly or when they go after Judges in articles
questioning sentences and/or condemning judges for statements made in court. Some judges have been taken out of context
and eviscerated by the local press—and the judges are powerless to respond.
If judges are ripped to shreds by the media for giving some
offenders (ones that are non-violent with a high likelihood of successful
rehabilitation) a second chance and a lenient sentence---the odds are that
these judges may be hesitant to offer these sorts of chances again.
The system, while imperfect, works. It is slow, plodding, and cumbersome, but it works. It works well when every independent agency
does their job and works together (Law Enforcement, Judicial, State Attorney),
staying in their own lanes.
Meanwhile, the costs of the system to the county are
mounting, and the need to find savings within this system is paramount.
Florida Tax Watch has several initiatives they recommend to
reduce the costs of incarceration. Most
of these recommendations will require coordination with Law Enforcement, State
and Federal Legislators, and most importantly with the State Attorney’s office that
prosecutes the cases and the Judges who impose the sentences. Many of these initiatives will require laws
to be amended in Tallahassee. The current leadership in the Florida Legislature
may not be receptive to weakening the “tough on crime” sentencing laws on the
books—so the BCC needs to be careful on pushing too hard for this at the state
level. However, we could advocate for
some of the initiatives.
Some of the initiatives that make sense to me include:
1.
Looking
at ways to substitute financial penalties for jail-time for non-injury Driving
While License Suspended (DWLS) infractions.
2.
Reducing the number of non-violent prisoners in
jail for minor drug infractions (users, not traffickers).
3.
Utilization of electronic monitoring for
non-violent offenders (subsidized if the prisoner is unable to pay)
4.
Looking at a plan to release elderly, sick
prisoners that do not pose a significant risk if released.
5. Diverting a large number of low-level offenders to our road prison program
5. Diverting a large number of low-level offenders to our road prison program
All
of these sorts of ideas could be considered but all of these require close
collaboration with the other stakeholders in the criminal justice system as
well.
Any of these things we can offer to the judges will help the system overall and will save taxpayers money. Before I will go along with these changes, though, I will need to ensure that we communicate such potential changes with Law enforcement, the judicial and legislative branches, and constituents in my district.
My constituents and I want safe neighborhoods and firm penalties imposed on criminals, not watered down, PC policies that could potentially increase crime locally. I will move through these initiatives very carefully and with great trepidation, because I am a law and order Commissioner and I favor the minimum mandatory sentences, Truth in sentencing laws, and harsh punishment for violent offenders and drug dealers. But I am open minded and not opposed to looking into the initiative I listed above and one BIG ONE below that didn't make the TaxWatch papers......
Any of these things we can offer to the judges will help the system overall and will save taxpayers money. Before I will go along with these changes, though, I will need to ensure that we communicate such potential changes with Law enforcement, the judicial and legislative branches, and constituents in my district.
My constituents and I want safe neighborhoods and firm penalties imposed on criminals, not watered down, PC policies that could potentially increase crime locally. I will move through these initiatives very carefully and with great trepidation, because I am a law and order Commissioner and I favor the minimum mandatory sentences, Truth in sentencing laws, and harsh punishment for violent offenders and drug dealers. But I am open minded and not opposed to looking into the initiative I listed above and one BIG ONE below that didn't make the TaxWatch papers......
********Florida
has the second highest number of prisoners that are illegal immigrants (second
only to Texas) with THOUSANDS of undocumented prisoners being held in our
prisons. Why can we not turn these over
to the Feds so they can be housed in the Federal system? This would generate REAL savings locally!************
No comments:
Post a Comment