Guidelines

I have established this blog as a means of transparency to the public, outreach to the community, and information dissemination to all who choose to look. Feedback is welcome, but because public participation is equally encouraged, appropriate language and decorum is mandatory.

Monday, August 31, 2020

Thoughts on the Primary Part III: How Did the Polling Play Out; How Did it Compare to Election Day Vote?

A picture of an Andy Marlette cartoon similar to this one (above) hangs currently outside the office of the District 2 Escambia County Commissioner.  This one, above, is a much better version of it though!

Winning an election is something that requires diligent effort, family and friends' support, intelligence, the right candidate, the right message, intuition, deft marketing, good campaign literature/materials, a strong campaign  "team,"-- and money.


As I proceeded with my campaign this go round in 2020--I knew it would be a tough election for me.  And this was even before COVID-19 and the difficulties this pandemic has caused all candidates in all races.  

We have a major FDOT (state) road project that is running 18 months behind schedule and causing MAJOR traffic issues to the largest area of my district, I have multiple neighborhoods with major drainage issues for which they blame me, and there are hundreds of citizens that are mad about runaway growth out in NW District 1----and blame me for all of it even though much of it was approved prior to my assumption of this office in late 2016. Add to this the OLF 8 development that has angered many  AND--there were/are active multiple facebook chat sites that have a couple of dozen members each  that disparage me continuously on a regular basis---- fomenting anger and hostility towards me constantly---attempting to remove me at election time.  This combined with what would prove to be a dismally small percentage of voters actually participating in this off-cycle primary election (more than 2/3 of the voters did not vote in the August 18th Primary Election)--and conditions were ripe for my potential ouster from this office; the conditions were perfect for a challenger to be successful against me in this election.  And I knew it.

So having the right message, the right strategy, and the right data, was critical for me to win re-election.

When I successfully ran for this office first in 2015-2016----I was fortunate in that I was able to go to 8,637 District 1 houses personally, door to door.  I learned a lot about what was/is important to citizens then, which allowed me the knowledge to put together a first hundred day plan for that election.

I utilized that information, plus input from citizens garnered this time from four years on the job talking to constituents in town halls, at coffee meetings, and at advisory committee meetings in order to formulate a guidance document, a strategic plan, that would be the centerpiece of my election.  I called that plan NEXT4Escambia--and it was very well received by citizens and I will be putting the ideas from that plan forward over the next four years now that I have won this election. 

POLLING DATA WAS THE KEY TO THIS ELECTION FOR ME

Nothing was more important and key to my victory than the data I gleaned from my multiple polling done with Gravis Marketing, though.  Nothing else even came close....

There were, to my knowledge, 7 polls run in my race for re-election as the D1 County Commissioner.  Of these 7--I have the results of 6 of them as 2 were run and published by INWeekly-and I personally ran 4 polls myself with Gravis Marketing: On February 1st, May 25th, June 26th, and July 22nd--I ran polls with similar questions in order to triangulate my position in the race in real time in the lead up to election day.  The 7th poll run was (I believe) put out in early July and it was a three-question survey that asked about the Presidential contest, my D1 race, and then one other question.  I believe Jesse's team ran that one and I never saw the results.  My guess is that I probably had a 10-point lead over Jesse at that point, and a 20 point lead over Jonathan.  Jimmie Trotter was never a factor in the race according to my polling.

I was never behind in any poll of which I was aware--even though some mixed signals were intentionally sent from "Rick's Blog" the day before the election--falsely intimating I was not leading every poll and not the front-runner but rather "in the running"--whatever that was supposed to mean.  It was bad information, fake news.  I led EVERY poll and was always the front-runner in this campaign and I challenge Rick Outzen or anyone else for that matter to show me data pointing to anything but this. (And the fact that Rick Outzen put out messaging signalling I was not leading in all polls is not surprising;  the fact he never disclosed that his pollster is/was Jesse Casey's Campaign Manager also--well that was a complete lapse in journalistic integrity.  Complete.  But not surprising.)

So from all of this polling data, I quickly ascertained that my only real competition in the race was Jesse Casey.  I held a large lead over him and the rest of the field in the early polling, but he steadily eroded this lead in each successive poll, and he had momentum going into election day.  Here is the way the polling looked, among Decided D1 voters of all parties through the first part of this year leading up to the election in my polling:

                     Feb 1st                May 11th                June 25th                July 19th               Primary (8-18)                        

Bergosh         52%                     46%                       45%                           42%                            38.7%                         

Casey             31%                    30%                        33%                           34%                            31.02%

Owens           13%                     16%                        17%                           14%                            22.48%

Trotter            4%                      8%                           5%                            10%                              7.8%


So the glide slope to the election was pretty consistent, with me in the 40s, Jesse in the low 30s, Jonathan in the teens (and trending downward in the last poll before the election) and Trotter struggling to get out of single digits.

The big surprise for me on Election Day was the extent to which Jonathan rose and Jesse and I went backwards.  I had predicted a much closer election margin between Jesse and I;  I had predicted it

Bergosh 40%, Casey 35%, Owens 18% and Trotter 7%.  My prediction was close, however Jonathan managed an 8.5 point rally that actually pulled from all the other candidates somewhat equally;  3.3% from me, 3% from Jesse, and 2.2% from Trotter.  And that is how we got where we ended up on election day.  And that is how I won this election.  With hard work, a good team, but most importantly with good data.



6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Whatever.. We don't answer the phone or polls or care what PNJ or the cartoonist or face book sites or DH Doug and company say. Gloat Gloat...Get over it.
Get to work.. Nanny Nanny boo boo .. stick your head in do do. ??? Get over yourself.

Here is your chance. Prove your worth. Watching. I think you will do well.

Anonymous said...

I looked at all the campaign donations for everyone in the race. It is interesting how some liberal folks and businesses always support your opponents and namely the two third place finishers of Owneds (2020) and Sindel (2016). I am surprised (not really) that Navy Federal Credit Union supported Ownes over you. Their head manager, Bill Dagnall (which means NFCU too) went all in for Ownes. I am a vietnam era veteran and my kids, who have also served, have tried to get jobs with NFCU, but they only hire weird piercing and colored hair social justice progressives who do not represent their members. Of course, you have geniuses like Dagnall who support the third place low % candidates and ignore military families like yours for jobs and elections. Well, it seems they have to deal with you for the next 4-years. Do what's right, but see if you can get them to hire more vets and kids from military families. I also hear that the new local head guy, who is a vet, tells his friends and other vets who inquire about jobs, "just keep applying." Wow! Thanks shipmate for helping a fellow sailor get a job at, wait for it, NAVY FEDERAL. What a disappointment!

Anonymous said...

PNJ covered a demo put on by the world worker party. Look them up and their agenda. Things like abolish the police, tear down prisons etc in other words do away with the republic. They stand with Kenosha burning down capitalists. Isn't gannet a corporation?

There are some real subversives around trying to destroy our country.

Anonymous said...

Looks like appointed superintendent of schools maybe a good choice. I'm glad they went outside the district and I'm hopeful for the choice they made.

Personally I'll never trust another democrat or one that teaches children to overthrow their own government. Watch the curriculum.

I am very relieved you were elected and that you have this blog to get your point across.


Anonymous said...

Both Ricks blog and North escambia only pass certain comments through.

They must want to teach support teaching critical race theory CRT and 1619 instead of 1776 nd support) democrats. (This is about the school superintendent and school curriculum. )
I don't think it's healthy to teach that in our schools.
People need to be taught the truth and bloggers posing as journalists are now called out. What -- are they afraid of the mob also?

Anonymous said...

CRT https://www.heritage.org/civil-society/commentary/how-leftists-critical-race-theory-poisons-our-discussion-racism