Special Interests, Unions, and Lobbyists Want Total Control over Florida's Students, Taxpayers, and Families....
Several
leading (self-anointed) state education advocacy associations, led by the
statewide teacher’s union, have filed a lawsuit Thursday assaulting school
choice for some Florida families. This lawsuit
seeks to end the nation’s largest tax-credit scholarship program, a program
that serves nearly 70,000 students statewide and 944 in Escambia County
alone. This wildly popular program serves primarily
poor minority students and all taxpayers benefit- as the cost per pupil in this
program runs about 50% of the cost per pupil in the traditional public school
systems.
Accountability
is built-in. Student progress is
measured, and the gains made by students in this program roughly equate to the
progress the students in traditional public schools achieve year over
year. Opponents counter that the system
isn’t fair because students in this scholarship program “don’t take all the
exact same tests and FCATs-like public school students must.”
So,
to follow that logic of these tax-credit scholarship critics, because traditional
public schools waste so much time over-testing and drilling students on how to
take tests-we should foist this same nonsensical practice on tax-credit
scholarship schools? That is ridiculous. We need to test less across the board-we all
know this!
The
plaintiffs in this lawsuit want this program killed so they can monopolize
education and leave parents NO choices; they think it’s all their money and “We
know what’s best for your kid” is their mentality. But I think we deserve a greater voice in how
our tax dollars are spent educating our own children-don’t you?
The
plaintiffs state that they worry about the amount of taxpayer money “diverted”
from local districts by this tax-credit scholarship that primarily benefits
underprivileged minority youth. But what
really worries these special interest groups is the loss of the money “diverted”
to their own coffers -via dues memberships fueled by taxpayer funded employees-
if this scholarship program grows!
The plaintiffs espouse the naive belief that
money is the panacea to improve school performance and this scholarship program
robs Florida of additional money for schools. But they know full well that throwing
more taxpayer money at schools doesn't make such schools better. Look no further than poor quality DC
and LA
public schools (Spending upwards of $30K per student) for proof.
I’m
a proponent of public schools, but I’m also a strong advocate for school
choice. These views are not mutually
exclusive. Offering choices in education fosters
competition; Adam Smith Economics 101 illustrates that with competition,
organizations increase quality and efficiency.
Currently
we have many Florida students that have not found success in our expensive
traditional public schools, but have flourished in a lower priced tax-credit
scholarship program. And so-called
advocacy groups are trying to kill this program? Why?
One
Escambia parent wrote “Please do not let the FSBA take away this awesome scholarship
that my boys are utilizing.” A local grandparent
wrote “Step up for Students has been a godsend for my grandchildren,” and a
local school principle stated “If quality education for Escambia County
students is the goal, then please help me continue to do my part in training
and raising up the next generation by opposing any actions brought about to
stop students from being helped by this scholarship.”
Instead
of listening to biased, self-obsessed labor unions and other special interest lobbying
entities, I’m listening to my constituents; I’m in agreement with them and
together we are on the right side of this issue.
I
hope Florida legislators and other education leaders with courage will listen
to students, parents, and taxpayers that benefit from this worthwhile program,
too.
2 comments:
If we are going to boast how students in these scholarship programs are successful, then apples need to be compared to apples, meaning that the same testing standards must apply.
Aaron, I don't necessarily disagree with you. Let's just be smart and do it starting with the public schools, and drastically reducing the massive amount of over-testing we are conducting. Like the Geico commercial, everyone knows we are drilling and testing way too much. Let's be smart and not knee-jerk a mandate on tax-scholarship schools that are successful in their current practice of teaching during the day, not testing, testing, testing, drilling, drilling, drilling. The fact that we over-test in public schools should be a concept that draws bi-partisan agreement.
Post a Comment