Guidelines

I have established this blog as a means of transparency to the public, outreach to the community, and information dissemination to all who choose to look. Feedback is welcome, but because public participation is equally encouraged, appropriate language and decorum is mandatory.
Showing posts with label Bay Center. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bay Center. Show all posts

Monday, March 11, 2019

New Field House Proposal Must Address Existing Civic Center Needs, Too!

....any talk of simply yanking dedicated Civic Center funding away for a new project, with no plan for what is to happen to our Civic Center, would be reckless and short-sighted.  It would not garner my support--and that is putting it mildly.  I would be vocally opposed.....

We will soon be hearing another pitch for a field house downtown.  I believe it will be coming this Thursday at the BCC’s Committee of the Whole workshop.

Full disclosure:  I support the field house concept under the right financial circumstances.

However—my firm belief is that we simply cannot siphon-off ANY existing revenue stream(s) from the aging and ailing Civic Center until we figure out what we must do with this existing county asset.  I have put forth plans (here and here) to renovate, modernize, and improve the Civic Center to get another 20 years of usefulness from it. 

But there has been no forward motion on these ideas.  I tried—hard—last year when I was chairman to move those renovation plans forward. 


There are multiple forces at work and at play on this issue though.  We all know this.

But my two cents here (and for my vote)—ANY field house proposal that is floated must come with a rigorously-vetted, detailed, and well-grounded study justifying the need and economic viability for such a facility going forward—particularly considering the new venues that have opened in Foley, Panama City, and the (soon to be announced) planned facility in Mobile.  To put it bluntly:  Do we still need one given that other markets all around us have now apparently beat us to the punch?

Also—there must be multiple financing sources contributing to the total for a new downtown field house to be viable, in my opinion.

It is for this reason I supported the concept last summer that was presented; it was a model that brought in multiple financing sources (new market tax credits, triumph funds, TDC funds) and it had a financing team in place to front-load the construction financing.  It was planned near a freeway and it was centrally-located.  It also would have greatly benefitted an area of the county that has blight, high unemployment, and a high crime rate.  This would have been a great way to inject jobs and capital into that area.  It was a project we should have moved forward.
 
But we didn’t.

The latest proposal I am hearing about now is a scaled-back version of a field house that is to be placed downtown.  No NMTC’s are available, and I’ve heard no mention of a Triumph Gulf Coast ask.  No realistic and viable financing plan has been put forward, and the financing, so far as I am