Guidelines

I have established this blog as a means of transparency to the public, outreach to the community, and information dissemination to all who choose to look. Feedback is welcome, but because public participation is equally encouraged, appropriate language and decorum is mandatory.

Sunday, January 29, 2023

Replacement of ECFR Station #20 Is Quickly Moving Forward---but How Come Station #20 Was Closed in the First Place?


The frontrunner parcel for creation of the long-awaited, new ECFR Station #20, is just south of Hwy 98 on the East Side of Bauer Road.


It has been too long now, since the closure of ECFR Station #20 by Escambia County several years back.

A lot has happened since the closure in 2018 and today--including very tumultous contract/pay issues with the former sheriff, OLF-8 acquisition, Jail Rebuilding, Hurricane Sally, and the worldwide COVID-19 Pandemic--just to name a few.  And as it is with most things government--nothing happens quickly.  As an example:  The hurculean effort at building a modern fire station in Beulah to replace Station #2 in that community began in earnest in 2014, 9 years ago,  with former Commissioner Robertson.   I took the torch in 2016 and have championed that project ever since.  But it is,was, and has been a long road on that one.  Currently, it is under construction, named, and slated for opening in 2024.

But there is a stark difference between Station #20 and staion #2.  Which I will explain, in depth, below.

HOW DID STATION 20 CLOSE--AND WHY THE LONG DELAY ON A REPLACEMENT?

Just about one year into my tenure as the District 1 Commissioner, a meeting was requested with me by a former county administrator and a former public safety director to discuss the issues with ECFR station #20.  I was told the station needed to be closed due to a lease issue with the property's owner--combined with a lack of need for the small, under-equipped and infrequently utilized facility. (e.g. I was told the station had responded to an average of one structure fire per year in the previous 5 year period).  I was also told that an agreement could be made with the Lillian Volunteer Fire Department (just over the Lillian Bridge in Alabama) to provide emergency fire coverage/protection for the area that had up until then been served by ECFR station #20.  Being a new commissioner, I took them at their word, did not push back (after all, they were the subject matter experts and in the executive branch--I am in the legislative--so this was their call to make), and the station subsequently closed.  That's what happened.

And very little transpired on that specific topic over the subsequent 12 months.  But then, just about a year after #20 closed, when we had a new administrator, I started getting angry calls from residents about their property insurance skyrocketing and being "non-renewed" due to their "ISO rating" going up.  Adding to the angst--several calls for fire support came in to that geographic area and were not responded to by the Lillian Volunteer Fire Department. They didn't just not get there late--they didn't respond at all.  So it was a double whammy I didn't see coming at the time.  And looking back in time, to the meeting where I was told that station #20 had to close--I realized that the critically important impact to my constituents in that area---massive property insurance rate hikes and possible non-renewal of some constituent policies due to the ISO rating increasing--was never imparted to me in that meeting with the administrator and public safety director.  

Nope, I was not told about the serious, damaging implication the loss of our own fire station would have on the residents in the area via these massive insurance premium increases and subsequent ISO rating increases--which drive the cost increases for insurance.  Shame on me for not knowing that, but I did not know that as a first year commissioner.  But staff should have been honest with me and told me--because they knew the ISO rating would be implicated but failed to tell me.  Had I been told, I would have pushed back and I suspect they know that.  Staff has to be honest with the policymakers, and if they know something but fail to tell the legislative that funds such operations for whatever reason (expediency, hesitence to discuss a tough issue, whatever the case may be?)---it is akin to a lie, so far as I am concerned.  If you know and don't tell me, you have lied to me, period. 

Those two individuals are gone, and there have been multiple administrators and public safety directors since that time.  The current staff are very well aware and attentive to this matter--which is why this in now moving ahead.  More on that below.

But back to the history.  So after a new administrator was brought in in 2019, and a new public safety director as well, I pleaded with them to bring a solution to the station #20 issue.  That former administrator's response:  "Commissioner-there are lots of houses in the county that are not located within 5 miles of a station."  Okay, I understand that and on it's face that is a true statement.  The difference here is my constituents had a station, had coverage and a concomittant lower ISO rating, and the county PULLED this resource from them with no plan to replace it.  That is the difference.  And I feel as though I was deceived in the way it was done due to the important facts left out of that initial meeting's discussion:  ISO and Insurance imlications.

So from 2019-2020 I kept bringing the issue up.  The flaccid, slow-rolling response from the now former administrator was unnerving and infuriating.  It was on the back burner.  Heck, it took 8 months of agitation by me to get that administrator to get off the dime and provide necessary mattresses to the volunteer firemen at station 2 who were at that time sleeping on ROCKs as mattresses.  Every excuse under the sun about those delays.  I fianally had to threaten to take my truck and county credit card to mattress discounters and buy the mattresses myself.  Shortly thereafter, as if by magic, the mattresses were delivered to station #2.  

So yeah, I pressed that administrator about replacing #20.  We could do it at the southwest sports

complex, we could acquire property, or we could do a temporary station to assist the constituents--but nothing happened.  It was slow rolled.  Eventually that administrator was shown the door, which was good.

A NEW STATION 20 IS COMING

Satellite imagery of the frontrunner parcel selected for replacement of ECFR station #20 in the Paradise Beach area of D1


Fast forward a year to late 2021 and what a difference a year makes!  We brought in a new fire chief, a new Adminstrator, and a new Public Safety Director---all of whom understood the need for a solution to the station #20 mess. We also raised ECFR pay and are very close to reaching an additional agreement with the fire Lieutennants.  Lots of positives from this new team. 

And since they have been here, this new team began looking at sites, driving the area, and moving for a solution.  They were in contact with the U.S. Navy throughout 2021 and 2022 working on a plan to acquire or lease DoD property for the construction of a station #20 replacement.

Fast forward to December of 2022--and three potential sites were identified and studied to see if they could accomodate a station.  Just last week, a site was settled upon, pending approval (which has now been requested by the county) from the DoD----and subject to the site's ability to contain a new station while having enough room to construct a storm pond to mitigate flooding concerns.   I'm confident this site will be able to do it and therefore this is the site we are moving ahead with.

In a hastily called Teams meeting last week with staff, I reiterated my commitment to contribute $2 Million in D1 Discretionary LOST toward this effort, subject to a board vote to approve this, and the team has said it would move forward with the "triangle" parcel on Bauer as the site for a new #20.

Staff are now moving at speed and have sourced a pumper truck for this station and the purchase of this truck is on this week's agenda.

Lots more to do, a few more hurdles to overcome, but the effort to replace Station #20 is moving ahead.  It has taken too long.  

So as to totally dispell some inaccurate assertions that "nothing" has been happening on this topic for the last 4 years and that new annonuncements are only being made because of other current events in Perdido--I felt it necessary to tell the accurate, complete, and honest history of this problem to set the record straight.  What I have written in this post is 100% the truth and the players involved all KNOW IT.

Yes, it has taken too long.  But now it is coming.  Stay tuned.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

You dodge issues and blame as good or better than anyone I’ve ever seen

Jeff Bergosh said...

11:27--The truth hurts some. Everything I said is truthful. But that doesn't matter to you JC, or is it AA? You simply pine for the days of your hero, the former D2 commissioner and his sidekick who are both gone now. Gone and forgotten. Meanwhile, I'm taking care of issues down in that former portion of what used to be DU's district that he could never bring in for the close. Stay tuned back-bencher, the closer is here and it's all about telling the truth, getting projects done, and moving this district forward. You can take your negative garbage attacks back home to citizen's hate chamber, home of the disaffected, despondent, no-life "12" that love to woodpecker their laptops all day like dervishes that never get anything accomplished. Have fun there!

Anonymous said...

You are hilariously thin skinned. Must’ve gone to the same school as Trump

Anonymous said...

Paradise Beach is in District 1, how can DU be blamed for this?

Jeff Bergosh said...

Joel, I mean 11:55--of course DU isn't responsible for the closure of station #20--that was the former Administrator and public safety director. DU was responsible for killing the four lane project on Sorrento, blocking beach access #4, and a host of other problems I have inherited but am now fixing, one by one, now that large sections of what used to be D2 have reverted back to D1 after the redistricting. The sum total of the 8 years of destruction wrought on that area that is now in D1 is this nascent effort at incorporation that is blamed on a lack of county resources. I can see why people might think that due to the 8 year drought of anything good happening and all the associated drama with that former D2 office. In an ironic twist, his former secretary now trumpets the call for incorporattion for these same reasons, yet when he and DU had a chance, it failed, it was a constant fail. Kind of like doing a rain dance then crying once it starts raining and they got wet. Regardless--If the incorporation succeeds--it actually makes the commissioner's job in that district easier, and the citizens will have a new layer of bureaucracy with which to deal, and between $3.5-$10Million in brand new taxes (ad valorem, utility bill taxes, and new business tax license fees) Meanwhile the county still will receive it's full levy so really the only ones who will be impacted are the taxpayers. Hopefully they will watch this closely, ask questions, get informed, and make the right choice if it goes to the ballot.

Jeff Bergosh said...

2:40--not sure where Trump went to school but I went to San Diego State and my skin is thick like leather, believe that.