A Pensacola resident, pictured above with his back turned to the dais and the speaker at last month's school board meeting, has stated
"the longer I am delayed, the more obscure I'll make my prayer when they finally allow it. Right now they are Pagan-level cooperation. More rejection and delays and I'll go to FSM. If they keep obstructing, I go Satanic."
"the longer I am delayed, the more obscure I'll make my prayer when they finally allow it. Right now they are Pagan-level cooperation. More rejection and delays and I'll go to FSM. If they keep obstructing, I go Satanic."
Really? He'll go Satanic? It sounds like a demand wrapped inside a threat.
My idea posted on this blog for accommodating Christians and other religions at
our monthly board meetings drew a huge online attack-directed at me. It really spun up 12-15 non- Christians
around the country as they responded to another blog post (utilizing pseudonyms) that
was full of inaccuracies, out-of-context quotations, and other propaganda anddisinformation.
The individual who
created this situation is also the guy who came to our last board meeting
and turned his back on the board and
speaker during the invocation. What a
swell guy! But, I’m not sure what he’s
all spun up over, I mean, according to him-one of my
counterparts on the school board already offered him the opportunity to bring an invocation—but he
summarily declined.
Apparently, he wants to be accommodated on HIS terms only…
Apparently, he wants to be accommodated on HIS terms only…
This individual was upset with me because I would not
acquiesce to his DEMAND that I allow him to skip the line, putting him in the
slot to speak ahead of 300,000 other Escambia County Residents, to give the
August invocation as my invited guest.
He was rude about it, mis-characterizing a phone conversation we had, and
emailing other board members his inaccurate and badly flawed view of our phone conversation.
At least one board member, apparently, has seen this guy's email and is under the naive, mistaken belief that his words are my words. They're not, and I'll correct this board member at the next workshop. I thought I made myself clear at the last workshop but perhaps this one board member did not hear what I said.
But I digress...
At least one board member, apparently, has seen this guy's email and is under the naive, mistaken belief that his words are my words. They're not, and I'll correct this board member at the next workshop. I thought I made myself clear at the last workshop but perhaps this one board member did not hear what I said.
But I digress...
Make no mistake: This
guy pictured and quoted above, David Suhor, wants to make a splash in the news, make a name for himself,
and come to our meeting and do something outrageous-that's my opinion based upon his actions and statements lately. His comments from an online blog post, attacking me, are telling of
his intent and those of his cronies. I’ll re-state this emphatically-I’m not participating in
someone’s prank. Check out what the real
intention is, what many of us have suspected, based upon David’s (and others’)
comments on this subject, below, from “The Friendly Atheist”:
David Suhor (posting
under the pseudonym an apple biter) Stated:
“The one SB member who gave me the OK is backing off, saying
she may have to give that date to a new SB member after the election. The
others are not responding to multiple requests from Humanists and atheists
seeking an equal opportunity to pray. They say they are waiting for legal
advice and planning a workshop to figure it out. Meanwhile, I have no doubt
they are lining up Xtians (and maybe one Jew) so they can say their spots are
all full until forever. This is a common tactic: Unwanted prayer-givers are
asking for inclusion. Instead of saying no, they SEEK OUT others of their own
faith and ask them to give their next invocation/s. That way, they can say
their date books are filled for YEARS. My reply: the longer I am delayed, the
more obscure I'll make my prayer when they finally allow it. Right now they are
Pagan-level cooperation. More rejection and delays and I'll go to FSM. If they
keep obstructing, I go Satanic. As an Agnostic Pagan Pantheist, I claim the
right to invoke any god/s I want”
RfromNY stated:
“I suggest someone pretend to be Xtian, get on the schedule,
then get up there with a prayer rug and bend toward Mecca, or pray to Satan, or
whatever. I don't care if it's lying, they've given us no choice.”
Paul stated:
“I wish I could go and give a prayer to Odin, performing all
the hammer rituals and everything”
Andrea A stated:
“someone please dress up as a "Witch Doctor" and
go to their next meeting”
To which rascal
barqucat replied:
“It is Florida, so it probably wouldn't be too hard to find
a "Witch Doctor" or at least a sympathetic Santeria priest or a
southern conjure-woman root-doctor”
In addition to these outrageous posts, many of these
allegedly very tolerant, progressive, and open-minded individuals have hurled
obscenities at me from all directions, calling me such lovely names as
“A F*%&ing
A$& H#&le!” and a “Piece of S#$T!” and others I won’t mention here...
Yeah, these swell, ultra-polite guys have only the best of intentions with their requests to deliver the invocation at the school board meetings.
Yeah, these swell, ultra-polite guys have only the best of intentions with their requests to deliver the invocation at the school board meetings.
…..Not so far as I can tell from the way they conduct
themselves!
Comments above quoted from the comments section of:
Mehta, Hemant. (2014) “Florida School Board Member Tells
Pagan: If You Deliver an Invocation, I’ll Walk Out and Ask the Crowd to Join Me.” The
Friendly Atheist, 8-22-2014.
4 comments:
Non-Christians are tired of Christians' overwhelming sense of privilege and entitlement. Why do you not get that?
Leave the prayers at home or in church, where they belong. Problem solved.
this guy sounds like a fringe element freakshow do it my way or
I will pray to the devil. Hope this guy gets no where close to any kids
Phoenix Malizia-This is not about an overwhelming sense of privilege and entitlement, this is about not turning a solemn invocation, meant for the benefit of the assembled legislative delegation, into a social statement by those who simply seek to spike the football in our faces to make some headlines. Our current system is legal and I really do not see it changing very much.
You say it's not about privilege and entitlement yet every single one of the people you've asked to give the invocation has done it as a Christian. Is a Buddhist's invocation any less solemn than your Christian one just because they don't have Mega-churches?
Who are you to judge what is and isn't a solemn invocation?
Post a Comment