Why Conflate Two Separate Issues?

Sometimes no matter how much spaghetti is thrown at a wall---none of it sticks.

The recent article by Jim Little of the PNJ had an appropriate headline and summary of a recent scandal at the county:  Someone stole information from the county's servers illegally, this issue is being investigated by the FBI, and currently Jonathan Owens, my former political opponent who I dispatched in the 2020 primary and who worked as former lighting-rod commissioner Doug Underhill's secretary--- has publicly proclaimed he has this stolen property.  Doubling down, I'm told he(Owens) went on the radio and was giddy about explaining how he read all the personal, private, privileged and confidential information that was contained within this stolen data file.  Going further, he even admitted to disseminating this stolen property.  

Now, he does not say how he came to possess it other than providing a flimsy, unbelievable story that this file magically appeared on his desk.  Abracadabra!  But really, who would buy that explanation?  It is unbelievable, and that's the polite way I will put that.

So yes, the story got that aspect of the issue right.

But then came a huge part of the story that was about an unrelated issue:  the now settled cases of alleged, purported misconduct at the county's EMS division from four years ago.  

No doubt, there were some problems with record keeping and organization and multiple persons were alleged to have been a part of some falsification of certifications and mismanagement of call logs.

But here is the fact:  Six personnel from the county all but had their careers destroyed with these allegations from a former medical director who herself is now gone.  Of these six, only one was adjudicated guilty.  The other five settled their cases and WERE NOT CONVICTED.  The county paid a $5,000.00 fine, we got new medical directors, we got new leadership, and our EMS department moved forward.  Case closed.  Ever since that witch hunt by a former medical director--which it was--we have been cleaning up the mess, paying huge settlements and legal bills for the abyssimal way these former employees, now exonerated, were treated by the county.  No due process, allegations that were untrue, and careers ruined.  

But all that is in the rear view.

So why conflate this current case of theft and mishandling of protected information with the ancient history of that case?  

Now, this same former medical director did file a Federal Qui Tam claim post-employment with a couple of lawyers who specialize in this.  But that is a separate case from the falsification of records case.  

But MOST IMPORTANTLY:  The personal, private, priviledged and confidential text messages these lawyers so desperately want to keep, the ones allegedly provided to them outside of the normal discovery process, the ones that were stolen, the ones that cannot be verified as accurate, and the ones that are being investigated by law enforcement for the way they were inappropriately obtained---have no bearing on that Qui Tam case.  None whatsoever.  I am a part of the legislative in this county--I have no day in-day out operational oversight of any department--let alone EMS billing.  I'm not a fact witness to any of these overbilling allegations, and any discussion of the former Medical Director contained within these stolen text messages from my personal phone would be irrelevant hearsay and not a part of any case--let alone this particular one.  This is all setting aside the fact that these files were not provided as a bonafide records request, they were obtained unlawfully and there is no way to discern whether or not lines have been added into this particular file nor whether or not other lines have been deleted or manipulated.  Bottom Line:  There is no way to authenticate what Jonathan has given to these lawyers in this Qui Tam case.  So why are the lawyers burning up the taxi meter, running up costs, on chasing this issue down a rabbitt hole?

So now comes the news journal-- conflating a serious, major theft with a closed case and a current case for which the stolen files have no bearing?

I know why the plaintiff's lawyers are doing this---they are running up the check hoping for some settlement of this case to cover these exhorbitant fees, throwing spaghetti at the wall, making tons of discovery requests, then modulating them and moving them around.  They are grasping at straws and hoping to find something to help their case.  So they are doing what these sorts of lawyers, working on contingency, do.  Doing what lawyers do--It's why they are so dang popular and beloved 😀.  

But why is the PNJ carrying these lawyers' water--instead of separating the real from the faux as they should?