5th Dimension's Rendering of this proposed development |
In parts I II and III of this series, as well as the initial post I made on this topic, I have gone through multiple documents that were utilized by staff in their approval of a currently under-construction, upscale townhome development in the Perdido area of District 1.
As I have documented in the previous posts---this project was conceived, planned, and ultimately approved while this portion of property was in District 2. The final piece of documentation was issued by the county about 30 days after this portion of the county became an official part of District 1 after the once per decade manditory redistricting process that concluded in December of 2021. So no matter who was the commissioner or who's district this fell in after redistricting--the project would have moved forward as the train had already left the station.
The other thing I have attempted to document in this series of posts is the fact that there was significant planning on this upscale development, there were multiple entities that issued permits for this construction, and numerous studies were generated to support this project's ultimate approval--including a detailed traffic study which I have read and published previously. Some have erroniously and angrily proclaimed that "The county did not do any due diligence before approving this development!!" This is untrue. The county did significant due dilligence and the documents I have released and am realeasing today support this truth. Additionally, and in addition to what we all know already (the property is/was zoned COM and the Future Land Use designation is MU-S--both of which support multifamily development) about why this was built here--I have now also confirmed with staff that this parcel has ALWAYS been either commercially zoned or that it carried the previous COM designation (C1) under the county's pre-2015 zoning designations.
It was always commercial, always zoned for multifamily, and for sale for years. That's the indisputable fact of reality.
So.... as I come close to wrapping up this series (only one more post yet to come) prior to the upcoming town hall I will have on this topic and others of concern to Perdido------ I have also received numerous additional documents pertaining to this development specifically which I am linking to this post here.
Readers who are interested in the facts and the timeline will find the stormwater study, the sales contract, design documents, and lots of additional information by downloading the files in this folder.
The PNJ has now also done a piece on this issue, which I must say was a well written, factual article.
more on that in Part V--the final post on this topic prior to the townhall.....
2 comments:
Jeff
Does this sound right ?
325 Units with 536 car spaces on the development - Has this same company done any projects up on 9 mile Rd recently ?
Did you manage to get a look at the hazmat mess your contractors are causing under the PK bridge, 1 rainfall and all that stuffs running into the coastal waterway - $fines for County/State - A lot of eyes on your oversight of this project right now.
Have you heard back about putting a northbound lane under the bridge for this development? We the locals would appreciate it as the risk of crashing a road vehicle around that bit is higher than ever.
Thanks
You have to wonder about people who build and live in storm surge areas.
https://youtu.be/02jF1YeILKc
Here is footage of Pine Island. Post Ian.
Post a Comment