A few people are talking about a master plan for Beulah, a few people. But of the hundreds and hundreds I have met throughout Beulah over the last year as I campaigned door to door, I must say not one mentioned as their priority creating a "Master Planned Community" for all of Beulah. Not one. I heard a lot of people concerned about unsafe roads, speeders in their neighborhoods, leash laws not being enforced, traffic on 9 mile road, concerns about unsafe intersections (Beulah and Mobile Highway, Millview Road and Mobile Highway, Klondike and Mobile Highway), and concerns about unsafe, narrow roads with no shoulders (Beulah Road, 8-Mile Creek Road, Klondike Road, Wilde Lake Blvd). But nobody uttered the phrase "Master Plan" as even a part of their concerns about Beulah. As a matter of fact, as a 12 year resident of Beulah, I hadn't ever heard anyone talk about making Beulah a "Master Planned Community". This almost seems like a solution looking for a problem..... This is just not something I have heard, as the only candidate in the race for county commission that is a full-time resident of Beulah. So, with this small group of vocal proponents of a Master Plan speaking up recently, I thought it might be prudent to discuss the differences between a Master Planned Community for Beulah, and the $635K Master Plan proposed as Phase I of the Restore Act project for OLF8.
We can do either or both, a "Master Plan for OLF8" and a "Master Planned Community"---but this is a POLITICAL decision that must take the views and wishes of the entire community of Beulah into account, and it must not be rushed through for political expediency like a square peg being driven into a round hole. So lets talk about what each of these concepts entails, with an emphasis for what is contemplated for OLF8....
We can do either or both, a "Master Plan for OLF8" and a "Master Planned Community"---but this is a POLITICAL decision that must take the views and wishes of the entire community of Beulah into account, and it must not be rushed through for political expediency like a square peg being driven into a round hole. So lets talk about what each of these concepts entails, with an emphasis for what is contemplated for OLF8....
There is a difference between a MATER PLANNED COMMUNITY and the OLF-8 MASTER PLAN under consideration in the RESTORE application.
Two different approaches.
A MASTER PLANNED
COMMUNITY (Disney’s Celebration, FL, Texas' The Woodlands, Del-Webb properties in the Desert Southwest.) has a very strict program; where
every area within the planning limits is pre-determined for a specific purpose.
Beulah residents may (or may not) desire to have government bureaucrats imposing strict facility types, designs and
precise land use requirements and control over their private property.
In the OLF 8MASTER PLAN considered in the RESTORE application, instead of bureaucratic
governmental imposition, the approach involves considerations for streamlined
and effective government investments – while maximizing flexibility for private
land owners in the area. The Beulah home owners I met with on their porches over the last year did not indicate to me that they wanted additional layers of bureaucracy thrown over their property-rights like a giant governmental wet blanket. My sense is that the majority of Beulah residents I spoke with want infrastructure in place before additional development takes place. The good news: The project to 4-lane 9 Mile road is beginning from Mobile Hwy to Pine Forest. The new interchange from Beulah Road to the interstate is planned and programmed. These two projects will do much to alleviate the consternation over traffic congestion expressed by many Beulah residents I have spoken with. So what is it, beyond these traffic issues, that Beulah residents really want?
LETS TALK FIRST ABOUT THE OLF MASTER PLAN CONTEMPLATED IN THE RESTORE ACT APPLICATION:
The purpose of a RESTORE application was to convince the
committee to approve a grant for Master Planning. It is a promotional document.
It is not comprehensive (thus the need for a Master Plan); but it alludes to
some of the strategies for providing a well-integrated and cost effective
planning product – and project. As such, there could be any number of considerations
with such a master plan. But in the application, there are two areas of
programming focus with regional implications that are promoted:
A) Community Economic, Physical and
Programmatic Synergies.
B) Regional Infrastructural and
Environmental Considerations.
In the case of (B); the primary challenges are
transportation, storm water and environmental protection. Other infrastructure
(water, sewer, gas, power, communications, etc.); are currently under
development with the various providers as part of the NFCU project. Those
extensions would be a more routine consideration. So the application tends to focus on the big
considerations and lifts.
A1:
Develop background information and input. Public information, studies, master
planning, etc. (not done at Ellyson).
A2:
Develop background information regarding process and timeline. Ensure that
public Master Planning funds are not invested until the correct time. (Don’t
waste public money).
A3: Develop clear
synergies with other programs, including state and local economic Plans and
Programs, for example: