I've been contacted by a number of citizens that want the county to draft an ordinance "prohibiting" panhandling.
Our board has discussed it, this issue comes up frequently. The problem is panhandling is allowable free speech according to the lawyers. Where counties can step in is when there is behavior is unsafe (e.g. if panhandlers are in the road). But even this behavior is tough to tackle--as by the time a complaint is made and a police officer is dispatched, such a violator more than likely will have retreated to the right of way or sidewalk. Thus, even that unsafe (and already illegal) behavior is next to impossible to curtail. And an additional ordinance enacted would do little to nothing to curb the behavior. It's like the genius state law passed last session about "noise from vehicles" that is so subjective, so opaque, that not ONE law enforcement agency in the state of Florida will be able (or willing) to enforce it.
But they passed a law, though! Problem solved! Drinks all around!! (Yet the noise from car problem persists.....)
You cannot legislate your way out of every problem.
Despite this being an axiom of truth most of us understand with crystal clarity--some folks with whom I have recently spoken "Want us to do something, pass an ordinance, or something, anything, to make this go away!"
Of course that's a fool's errand for multiple rational reasons.
And meanwhile----panhandling persists. Homelessness is a growing problem. And yes, the two are intimately intertwined. Along with untreated mental illness, poverty, social dysfunction, and addiction.
Yesterday evening we received word that Pensacola is opening a homeless facility. Good, good for them and I wish them all the best. Meanwhile, the county has $4 Million to help with the problem and I can't get the city to even respond to a request for a joint meeting. We have sent no fewer than 4 requests. I've spoken personally to the mayor. I've spoken to Connie Bookman. They obviously don't want a meeting with the county.
So I'm adding this topic to our next meeting on August 4th. Maybe the city will do their thing, and the county will do our own? Maybe that is what the city wants, due to their lack of interest in a joint meeting? Who knows?
Nevertheless---I still think scaling up the Satoshi Forest model, deep in the woods, away from subdivisions and residences is the way to go. Something that is secure, with wrap-around services brought out to the camp, and where no drugs are tolerated and where security and CC cameras are present to maitain safety and order.
Interestingly---The students from CLA independently brought the same general, basic concept. (Minute 13:00 of this video)
So the county will discuss this on the 4th and figure out the answer to an important question: How do we best spend the $4 million earmarked to assist this problem?
I have my thoughts, now hopefully we will get the conversation started on the dais so I can hear what my counterparts want to do about it.
And I guess we will be doing it separately from what the city is doing....
Complex issue, lots of moving parts, no easy solutions.