Guidelines

I have established this blog as a means of transparency to the public, outreach to the community, and information dissemination to all who choose to look. Feedback is welcome, but because public participation is equally encouraged, appropriate language and decorum is mandatory.

Friday, March 12, 2021

Inside the DPZ Text Messages and Emails: Part VI "Navy Fed Got Burnt"

 

Why does DPZ feel "Navy Fed got 'burnt' on this deal?"

As I wake up today coming off of what I felt was a good meeting yesterday (beginning at 20:08 of this video), where the commissioners were working together and arrived at a compromise for the development of OLF-8--I can't help but wonder about the text message, above, from Mike Weich of DPZ Co Design to Marina Khoury, also of DPZ Co Design.  In it, Weich states that  he "Just feel(s) bad for Navy Fed...they were 'burnt' on this deal."

This text message comes as a result of a public records request that DPZ fulfilled late last week.  The context of the above quote is:   this was a commentary between these two on a series of unflattering articles, blog posts, news pieces and television stories that came out last month illustrating the fact that there were several "behind the scenes" meetings between Navy Federal Credit Union, a coalition of NFCU employees and some residents, and the county's consultant, DPZ.  In these meetings, county staffers were specifically excluded and the goal of "embarrassing" and undermining the BCC's goals were discussed and DPZ staff was copied on these plans.

Then it was also revealed in these articles that the chief media spokesman for NFCU, Bill Pearson, was simultaneously working with the "NO Commerce Park on OLF 8" campaign against the BCC.  He (Pearson) even helped edit their talking points.  And Marina Khoury was aware of this, as members of the DPZ team were copied on these conversations.  Sadly, at the time these machinations were occurring, nobody at the BCC (DPZ's Client) was notified in real time.  Many believe this was a breach of DPZ's ethical obligation to the BCC, DPZ's sole client here on this OLF-8 project.  This all was discovered after the fact--- which was embarrassing for both NFCU and DPZ.

So perhaps Weich feels NFCU got "burnt" because of the poor way in which DPZ handled these actions--leading to the conduct at issue being discovered through a local journalist's public records request?  If that's why he feels they got "burnt"- he should look in the mirror for the culprit.

But maybe Weich feels NFCU got "burnt" because they didn't successfully kill all the jobs and commerce to be developed on OLF-8?  (This could be valid--as prior to the embarrassing public records emails detailing the NFCU behind the scenes involvement with DPZ in this---what was

supposed to be unbiased process----the originally presented plans had LOTS more residential and LOTS less commerce.  This would have been exactly what NFCU wanted.  But now the latest compromise hybrid plan has 3X the acres for job creation of the previous plans!)

Maybe Weich feels NFCU got "burnt" because they agreed to pay back the county, under certain stipulations, for the cost of the master planning.  This was agreed upon via a memorandum of agreement between the county and NFCU.  Perhaps Weich knows that even though the new hybrid plan was agreed upon by the board, and developed with input from NFCU, Florida West, the BCC, and PEDC--maybe he knows in his heart this isn't exactly what NFCU wanted, yet due to the publicity of the whole DPZ email/text messages fiasco---NFCU will now be all but obligated to pay the full reimbursement to the county--even though he knows this isn't the plan NFCU wanted.

But in the end, if Weich and Khoury feel NFCU got "burnt" in this deal---they should be the ones to apologize to NFCU for it, they allowed it to happen.

I simply get back to the fact that we arrived at a compromise;  nobody (not even NFCU) will get everything they want, and all of us will have to settle for accepting some of what we specifically did NOT want.  That's the way a compromise works, Mike.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Blog about it some more. Jesus christ, man.

Jeff Bergosh said...

....Anon 9:23--don't worry, I will. I will continue to do so until I have gone through all of these disturbing texts and emails (which I just this morning am finding more of) or until Memorial Day, whichever comes first. Don't worry though, this isn't all I am going to be blogging about. There are lots of things going on, and I can certainly walk and chew gum at the same time....

Anonymous said...

Who runs Navy Feds PR effort? He's terrible. Who runs Navy Feds Government out reach? He's terrible. Who runs Navy Feds crisis response to bad press? She's terrible. Who runs Navy Feds legal policy as it relates to the sunshine law? She's terrible. For a world leader in banking, their work is quite amateur and uncoordinated. Same for DPZ. Getting a look at these communications they thought were secure is awesome! Any more juicy ones coming out?

Anonymous said...

The real games will begin when the offers start come in.

A few searches do expose some of the manipulations, for the curious. Thanks for the breadcrumbs...and pulling back the curtain.

Old Pulse articles and comments other searches put it together. tag Quint Studer

Look like a person who has a political consulting business is in on this master planning to benefit and old flame from downtown who uses EDATES in real estate. and public private partner ships.

I think you put this together. The average blabbermouth on facebook/ voter probably doesn't know and still paints you as a bad guy.

I think impact fees and concurrency are good ideas but it would have to be applied equally county wide. Do it.

This property is very desirable apparently. Maybe being in the real estate business is not such a good idea for the board. I see lawsuits on the horizon as people vie for this.

Selling it forthright in one piece may be best as a whole for the board and the citizens and you do stay in the work of pavement and public safety. I bet you could treble your money immediately.

My 2 cents.

Maybe the hybrid Master Plan is a good overlay all in all.

But yes PNJ should get rid of Marlette and most know the man behind the curtain now.

Impact consulting. Southetown...etc..

The school board did some strange things with Hemmer and the Garden street property with the old USO building.

So yes making money is real estate and politics is a volatile mix.

Attorneys are probably licking their chops.. waiting in the wings.

Unload it.

Out here..



Anonymous said...

Remember the "hamstring the BCC" in the margins of the Beach Access #4 offer?
Hope that public owned area gets opened soon.

That's unrelated in a way but it demonstrates money, influence, real estate and politics are mired together.
--
PNJ -- report facts.

BCC -- Pave roads. Manage growth.

Straighten out the tax base with the beach leases.

Don't raise taxes.. No consolidation with Pensacola. (doubles property tax)

(is privatizing public safety a bad thing?) It looks the some use EMS for a taxi service..

Thank you for your work as a public servant.