Guidelines

I have established this blog as a means of transparency to the public, outreach to the community, and information dissemination to all who choose to look. Feedback is welcome, but because public participation is equally encouraged, appropriate language and decorum is mandatory.
Showing posts with label Lawyers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lawyers. Show all posts

Thursday, August 3, 2023

We Demand Your Internet Search Histories: from Every Device You Own!

 They want it all--every item "searched-for" from every computer or device we own.  In addition to thousands and thousands of documents from the county based upon hundreds of search terms that will require a superhuman (and expensive) effort to find, produce, analyze, and redact.

Yes, these are the demands being made of multiple commissioners in the wake of a lawsuit filed 175 miles away from Pensacola by the medical examiner against two area funeral home directors.

And now commissioners are getting dragged into this spat like dolphins caught in a longline tuna fishing hunt.

And they are requesting the search histories from four commissioners from every computer and electronic device we own.  What??

How would one even capture such data?  I have no idea.  But more importantly--these sorts of things are not public records and more importantly are not germaine to this fight.  I would venture a guess that production of such personal items would require a search warrant and probable cause that an actual, serious crime was committed before such broad brush, invasive, Orweillian type of demands would ever be countenanced.  I mean, this is the sort of thing FBI gets from google to investigate suspects arrested on suspician of serial killings, like that weirdo in New York --Rex Heuermann.

I mean--as crazy as our country and some litigation is getting today in some cases-----and it is chilling------this request is just way too broad and onerous.  

Yes, yes.  I know some are upset that letters were sent and published describing hideous things happening to bodies and these letter writers' personal/professional opinions on supposed mistreatment of these bodies.  I get that.  I read the letters.  But these letters were sent and so far as I understand it many of the allegations were true which prompted some reforms in some processes at the ME office.  That's a good outcome, right????

But no.  Now we are attempting to do a scorched-earth, take no prisoners, gigantic gill-net fishing expedition because somebody got her feelings hurt.  Garbage.

Thankfully  the county produced a four-pager yesterday to request the judge to quash this nonsensical, ridiculous, outrageous "demand" by the Medical Examiner's lawyer.  Read it, below.






Sunday, December 9, 2018

How Bogus, BS Lawsuits foster Disdain for Lawyers and the Law, Part II

Was it, and is it, "ethical" for lawyers to team up with plaintiffs to sue small business owners, Counties, Cities, and others, en masse, making fortunes for themselves and their plaintiffs---under the guise of providing greater access for disabled individuals?  I say the answer is NO!


The Americans with Disabilities Act, Discrimination, The Unruh Civil Rights Act, The Unfair Business Practices Act, and Accessibility to Public Places.


In 2002 I had just opened my third and fourth businesses, respectively, when I was hit with my first lawsuit as a small business owner. I was leveraged and I was vulnerable so the timing of the lawsuit, at that point in my life, could not have been worse.  The suit itself was ridiculous--it was bogus.

A disabled person, confined to a wheelchair, a person who lived in the San Francisco Bay area--500 miles away from one of my establishments in the southern California City of La Mesa-- "suddenly" felt the need to come down  and have a beer at my place.  At least that's what he claimed, anyway.

But the truth of the matter was his complaint was bogus, the basis was bogus, and it was part of a scheme to make money under the guise of expanding "access" for persons with disabilities.

This was a serial litigant that had an attorney filing cases on his behalf and they were all making money at the expense of small businesses statewide.

Now, nobody would ever argue with expanding access to public accommodations for folks with disabilities.  The problem was--I was never given a chance to fix the problem before I was sued and hit with demand letter. .    Nope.  Like that pop-song by Drake --it went 0 to 100 real quick.

Conveniently, if I agreed to play along, the suit would be dropped, the lawyer for the plaintiff would be paid, the plaintiff would be paid, and everyone would be happy....eventually I had to hire my own attorney, threaten to sue my own insurance company (Lloyds of London) to compel them to kick in

How Bogus, BS Lawsuits foster Disdain for Lawyers and the Law, Part I

Bogus lawsuits fueled by greed lead to negative perceptions of lawyers
The County has recently been hit with a B.S., BOGUS Lawsuit.  It is infuriating on several levels, and it gave me a moment of Deja-Vu as I read the complaint.  I've seen these before.  More on that in Part II.

These sorts of complaints, these baseless, bogus suits happen frequently and they create a negative perception of lawyers and the law.  I have personal experience with these as a small business owner, a school board member, and now as a county commissioner.  And I have discussed these sorts of things, at length, with my brother (who himself is a lawyer).

Because my brother is a lawyer and now he is a judge, I have had a long running "shtick" that I use on the unsuspecting and the ones that know me--when the subject of lawsuits, lawyers, and the law invariably comes up.  "I HATE all lawyers, except for one."  People that know my brother typically chuckle.  Of course it isn't true, it is a gross exaggeration.  But there is a tinge of truth there, no question about it....

My new "shtick" I use since my brother became a judge goes like this....  Someone says something, in passing, akin to---"Hey Jeff, I saw your brother the other day..."--which is not an infrequent comment I hear---to which I quickly reply with one of the following three variations "I hope the sentence he handed you was fair" or "I apologize for his horrible conduct" or "I hope you ended up on the right side of the verdict." [Insert sound of a rimshot]

It's all in good fun-----until it's not.

You see--when you are served papers--when you are sued personally or in your capacity as a business owner, when the allegations are bogus--It becomes serious very quickly. Most folks may never